My vision of Qualia

1.Outside fact. (Impersonal fact)

Qualia: They’re Not What They Seem
John Gibbons

http://www.unl.edu/philosop/people/faculty/gibbons/qualia.htm

"the view that qualia have the properties typically attributed to them is unjustified."


I'm connecting to this because it is for me this moment's example of philosophy trying and failing to distinguish between things that involve electrons, photons, wave length and like physical phenomena, and memory and perception and etc. made out of those scientific basic bricks. Qualia is a sort of ghost in philosophy. There are theories, but far too many questions. Like all problems, it should be treated like: a,b,c and nothing else possible. I am doing just this.


2. Internal fact. (Personal fact)

My vision of qualia.

I see usually people select RED as the most common qualia, I'll use red.

-1. -> Qualia:

-1. Read my technic blog. Sleep on it. If id doesn't make sense read another 2000 books of the best in time. Come back.
0. Nothing. Metaphysics.
1. The brain works on differences.
2. Everything is a multiple of the electron's revolutions around the atom. All the power of everything and all the time are measured as a multiple of what we can find in the atom.
3. All brain differences are a multiple of the electron's and atom's nature.
4. RED is all of the being's affected noumena while the sensorial existence is RED.
5. We calculate our being relative to something of atoms and electrons, we then tune in to that something, generalize that perticular experience, and then particularize RED:

6.

a. biologic/physics/chemical/etc. wavelength/rgb/white all - black none formula for EYE sensorial existence RED.

b. Cultural large piece, RED-ed all over. FEEL!!!!

c. Take general formula samples from all categories of internal existence, everything that seems RED.

d. take and make sensorial existence RED, take and make cultural RED samples. Tune in all your general cyclic known components to the scietific prints of red beam of light. MIX WELL in an afective experience of 2-3 days length, a specific, deep RED one.

e. Think: This is RED. Everything that makes a difference somewhere, if my brain identifies it with my pointy waves(Link, point 19) vectorial map of my fresh RED experience and, mainly, with my fresh empirical understanding of SCIENCE's basic particularities for RED, then that difference is the action of the color RED. That is the objective phenomena, the noumena for RED. That is the PARADIGM for RED qualia.

Quote again:
"the view that qualia have the properties typically attributed to them is unjustified."

1.They have the properties attributed to them only when you think at the symbol of qualia. 2.Otherwise, when you are experiencing the RED qualia, you ARE it's attributes. Then comes the problem of not being a donkey and confusing your thinking with your perceiving, your sensors, your sensorial mix, your apperception, your different kinds of memory, etc., and coming up with different qualia things derived from the qualia that in fact serves in the same line of sensorial-perceptive-thoughty-apperceptive-etc.

The whole problem with qualia: infinite mixes of it's multiple instances from the following layers and/or more or other kind of distinctions to those specific layers:

-there's it's object - light, shaped.
-it's perceiver system - eyes, visual brain.
-it's id presence - taken from everything.
-it's sensed and perceived character combined at the level of noumena with all different kinds of existences in the brain, resulting in feelings that qualia is something from inside sticking to something undefined from outside, then defining the qualia as the undefined from outside, but on the terms of the inside stuff that originally sticked to the outside original stuff, etc.
-it's noumenal identity shoved inside memory with a hundred filters of category and experience and then taken back mixed a thousand times.

The factual explanation of how qualia borns:
1.The RED general noumena transfers it's identity into the brain. 2.At each level of existence from eyes to the depest memory, 3.the particular processes of conscience and awareness takes place. Conscience is a reverberation. 4.When the usual maximum level of reverberation intensity takes place then a plateau formes. That plateau is the sensorial experience, made of qualias.
The mistery to qualia is to get INTO and OUT FROM that plateau, at will, with any and all of the functions of existence - sensorial existence, sensorial mix, perception, thought, understanding functions, memory, buffers. This circuit brings information into us. We may perfectly define qualia, but going with the information and discovering it's path as it serves itself in real time, ever new to us, is necessary to define qualia acceptably. Because the mystery of qualia is that of the id and the id comes from everywhere in the brain.


Apperceptive qualia must be built. If it fits right, then the speculated theory shakes hands with the real and the double reality becomes one, at the meeting place. They communicate and exchange consistency. The theory becomes real. This is practical philosophy. The mind as a thing in itself all over. I am not finding it on the internet. I have to keep looking for a trace, I have just read blogs and this sort of stuff until now.

The philosophic world I see on the internet does have the correct theories to build apperceptive qualia, but the practical action requires enlightenment - the entire bouquet in action. It requires the entire spectrum of the brain's somatic functions to be enumerated and then applied into particular apperceptive qualias, then connections must be made that unify the particular qualias into a big qualiatic somatic function, that gets to melt apperceptive theories into qualia-state existence.

Big-Bang! You now enter the realm of apperception induced qualia - my 12 post in my technical blog, Mental Alchemy.

Man, I am so great. People should come and bring flowers at my feet, but everyone's so afraid.