0. Certainty of the r.d.u.t.s.
1. Certainty of matter
First there is certainty over the exact identity, or, by other names, fingerprint, print, constitution, etc. of material facts. This does not include the spirit or it's material constitution eg. brain physical phenomena, because point 2.
Example:
SHORT: made of iron, wood, tastes like vinegar, |perfect affective analysis|.
Long: an apple is made of cells filled with water, water from the sea, rain and bottles and cells from cellulose, with that ascertained chemical constitution.
2. Certainty of presence of interpretation
Second, there is certainty over interpretation that a certain p.o.v. gives to imaterial facts, like mathematics or meaningless acts or material transformation. Mostly uncertain.
Example:
SHORT: vinegar is bad. He hates him. That action seems unbalanced. |Perfect relative dynamic analysis of arbitrarily and unconsciously interpreted certain facts.|
Long: why kids act sometimes like they do is an uncertain fact, either from a behavioral p.o.v. or cognitive, or psychoanalytic.
END
This point of view is making a good attack on angles of interpretation over perfection, relativity.
When all phenomena is accesed noumenally things have explanations and engines that achieve their target, but the satisfaction with incompleteness and failure of normal people mixed with systematic noumenal thought's lack of dependencies and high level of tolerance for rubbish prevents the fact of failed communication to surface. People fail to insert communication acquired necessity into their high level consciousness and behavior. If only what is recognized as perfect would be put into high level consciousness then programming would perfectly work, but certitude is acknowledged and simply forgotten.
The real problem of comunication with day to day people stays in primitives like substance - compound. The dynamic independent systems of interpretation seem like ordinary particularities to normal people. The final set of simple rules, being and giving perfection do not count as absolutes to normal people. Independent thought is nothing to them. Only obligation counts into their absolute.
So it is necessary as crushing and victourious into polemics that culturally clean unitary noumenal systems of being be sustained most aggressively as winning particularities. Thus compounds that offer the greatest mass of organized substance, at the minimum of 1 unit of particularity per 1 unit of necessity, equaling to fullness of substance and compound.
CONCEPTThus knowledge must be respected and worshipped as the highest stuff, from which all things become. Let along the stupids that don't know knowledge.
FLOWThus show knowledge, explain, then do the 2_ and 3_, = the flows. And flows gather everything / everybody. BUT strike! with raw, brute, crushing, unforgiving knowledge.
Through strict, harsh, martial sobriety of the centered(being_in_center) relative dynamic unitary transcendental system, IFF, the particularity of normal people can be hold. Repetition and redundancy of particular matters !replacing r.d.u.t.s. acts !fullbrain_sublimechoice to identical particularities, and thus series the most sharp, fast and finite sublimation series of processes strikes, imbuing the undeveloped human to function in artistic manner, subliming THE,SPECIFICALLY,ANDONLYTHE the highest brain energy.
