Information, but information handling?

Information access is the ultimate task of the intellect.
The management of colossal databases is the ultimate task of the intellect.


Information -> Handling
I have personally set up a network of processing and creating information that can produce quantities way out greater than what could be handled.

Creating -> Creating Handling
The structure of processing itself provides the answer to those quantities. By exercising it and letting it adapt to the brain, and the brain to it, structures can be produced that can handle an ever increasing, no matter how large database. Formatting is strict, in fact it's absolutely particular and nothing more.

Carriages of information
-Special formatting is required.
-The format is absorbed by the tools used to control the information, with the purpose of keeping the information 100% pure, unaltered, in it's initial noumenal form.

Proportions between current dimensions of the systems and the needed ones in order to handle serious information. (A good suggestion is the bold text here and it's target. Seriously.) (So I added one sentence worth of dramatic touch.)
This second point suggests how big the system of containing information must be in order to contain large quantities of it. Even the elementary technology of passing format to the receptacle is already too much for available standards (philosophy still can not define things in their noumenal nature, the complete metaphysical reverse engineernig of the human being's mind is far out... ... ... damn it... I have finished it at 16 years old.).

The "daily 2 minute hate" against the system:
(NOTE: The 100% dose of alteration that the individual has, inside the current mechanisms of social and psychological formatting, shows purely that the mechanisms are self-defeating, thus evil and stupid. (NO, YOU PIECE OF SHIT, I WAS READY TO EXPLODE AT 17 YEARS OLD. And the problem is that I didn't! And the problem is that I had no place to. And the problem is that there is no medium in which to function. And this is certain because there are no traces. (The movie must format itself to the public, so that the public remains intact! (YOU PIECE OF SHIT! (well, you're not exactly a social engineer, but more of a dialectic piece of shit!(a necessity driven to self contentedness one, too))))))
(More to go: aren't your first experiences the most powerful? Aren't doing yourself at infinity to reach that first time when you were a child? Maan, I have had your life when I was barely walking. All of it. I had stepped with my foot over every man, animal, subject or object. You're slowly walking, all of your miserable life, over this path. I was iron immortal in childhood. Stop it. Why are you still trying? Go down. I'll wait for your answer. (This "evil" sound has came naturally, by the way. I would not harm somebody, for now, by crossing the categorical imperative.))
2mHate: OVER

Thus, the brain and humans' method of treating data must evolve to a certain standard if any power processing will be done.

I have not seen in any informational medium any minimum trace of adequacy (the quality of this present adequacy beying universal, general, not particular at all) at the level of systems handling information. There is information made into systems, that's right. And to handle it you must have a serious background of general education and talent and expertise. BUT there's none that unfolds from the absolute level to that of information, so there's no system that holds information, but only information made into systems.

Impregnating your wife does not make you a genetic engineer.
2mHate: Calculating thousands of factors instead of millions and billions makes you an office plant, not an intellectual. Your stomach and bowels are actually smarter than your mind. 2mHate: OVER

Having written all this, there's but one more: Come learn my systems and let'us do BUSINESS!

www.History-BrakingEasyMentalPerfection.com